You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictors of Outcomes in Autism Early Intervention: Why Don’t We Know More?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2014.00058 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giacomo Vivanti, Margot Prior, Katrina Williams, Cheryl Dissanayake |
| Abstract |
Response to early intervention programs in autism is variable. However, the factors associated with positive versus poor treatment outcomes remain unknown. Hence the issue of which intervention/s should be chosen for an individual child remains a common dilemma. We argue that lack of knowledge on "what works for whom and why" in autism reflects a number of issues in current approaches to outcomes research, and we provide recommendations to address these limitations. These include: a theory-driven selection of putative predictors; the inclusion of proximal measures that are directly relevant to the learning mechanisms demanded by the specific educational strategies; the consideration of family characteristics. Moreover, all data on associations between predictor and outcome variables should be reported in treatment studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 54 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 49 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,215,004
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#922
of 7,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,482
of 243,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.