↓ Skip to main content

A Child with Acute Encephalopathy Associated with Quadruple Viral Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Child with Acute Encephalopathy Associated with Quadruple Viral Infection
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fped.2015.00026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keiko Nakata, Mitsuru Kashiwagi, Midori Masuda, Seiji Shigehara, Chizu Oba, Shinya Murata, Tetsuo Kase, Jun A. Komano

Abstract

Pediatric acute encephalopathy (AE) was sometimes attributed to virus infection. However, viral infection does not always result in AE. The risk factors for developing infantile AE upon virus infection remain to be determined. Here, we report an infant with AE co-infected with human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) and three picornaviruses, including coxsackievirus A6 (CVA6), Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68), and human parechovirus (HPeV). EV-D68 was vertically transmitted to the infant from his mother. CVA6 and HPeV were likely transmitted to the infant at the nursery school. HHV-6 might be re-activated in the patient. It remained undetermined, which pathogen played the central role in the AE pathogenesis. However, active, simultaneous infection of four viruses should have evoked the cytokine storm, leading to the pathogenesis of AE. an infant case with active quadruple infection of potentially AE-causing viruses was seldom reported partly because systematic nucleic acid-based laboratory tests on picornaviruses were not common. We propose that simultaneous viral infection may serve as a risk factor for the development of AE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 7%
Netherlands 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 57%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2015.
All research outputs
#18,405,265
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3,339
of 5,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,015
of 263,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#21
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.