↓ Skip to main content

Incidence of Platelet Dysfunction by Thromboelastography–Platelet Mapping in Children Supported with ECMO: A Pilot Retrospective Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incidence of Platelet Dysfunction by Thromboelastography–Platelet Mapping in Children Supported with ECMO: A Pilot Retrospective Study
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fped.2015.00116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arun Saini, Mary E. Hartman, Brian F. Gage, Ahmed Said, Avihu Z. Gazit, Pirooz Eghtesady, Umar S. Boston, Philip C. Spinella

Abstract

Bleeding complications are common and decrease the odds of survival in children supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The role of platelet dysfunction on ECMO-induced coagulopathy and resultant bleeding complications is not well understood. The primary objective of this pilot study was to determine the incidence and magnitude of platelet dysfunction according to thromboelastography (TEG(®))-platelet mapping (PM) testing. Retrospective chart review of children <18 years old who required ECMO at a tertiary level hospital. We collected TEG(®)-PM and conventional coagulation tests data. We also collected demographic, medications, blood products administered, and clinical outcome data. We defined severe platelet dysfunction as <50% aggregation in response to an agonist. We identified 24 out of 46 children on ECMO, who had TEG(®)-PM performed during the study period. We found the incidence of severe bleeding was 42% and mortality was 54% in our study cohort. In all samples measured, severe qualitative platelet dysfunction was more common for adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-mediated aggregation (92%) compared to arachidonic acid (AA)-mediated aggregation (75%) (p = 0.001). Also, ADP-mediated percent of platelet aggregation was significant lower than AA-mediated platelet aggregation [15% (interquartile range, IQR 2.8-48) vs. 49% (IQR 22-82.5), p < 0.001]. There was no difference in kaolin-activated heparinase TEG(®) parameters between the bleeding group and the non-bleeding group. Only absolute platelet count and TEG(®)-PM had increased predictive value on receiver operating characteristics analyses for severe bleeding and mortality compared to activated clotting time. We found frequent and severe qualitative platelet dysfunction on TEG(®)-PM testing in children on ECMO. Larger studies are needed to determine if the assessment of qualitative platelet function by TEG(®)-PM can improve prediction of bleeding complications for children on ECMO.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,759,606
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,861
of 5,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,481
of 393,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.