↓ Skip to main content

Growth in Children with Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease in the CKiD Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Growth in Children with Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease in the CKiD Cohort Study
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fped.2016.00082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erum A. Hartung, Katherine M. Dell, Matthew Matheson, Bradley A. Warady, Susan L. Furth

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that some children with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) have growth impairment out of proportion to their degree of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The objective of this study was to systematically compare growth parameters in children with ARPKD to those with other congenital causes of CKD in the chronic kidney disease in Children (CKiD) prospective cohort study. Height SD scores (z-scores), proportion of children with severe short stature (z-score < -1.88), rates of growth hormone use, and annual change in height z-score were analyzed in children with ARPKD (n = 22) compared with two matched control groups: children with aplastic/hypoplastic/dysplastic kidneys (n = 44) and obstructive uropathy (OU) (n = 44). Differences in baseline characteristics were tested by Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Fisher's exact test. Matched differences in annual change in height z-score were tested by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Median height z-score in children with ARPKD was -1.1 [interquartile range -1.5, -0.2]; 14% of the ARPKD group had height z-score < -1.88, and 18% were using growth hormone. There were no significant differences in median height z-score, proportion with height z-score < -1.88, growth hormone use, or annual change in height z-score between the ARPKD and control groups. Children with ARPKD and mild-to-moderate CKD in the CKiD cohort have a high prevalence of growth abnormalities, but these are similar to children with other congenital causes of CKD. This study does not support a disease-specific effect of ARPKD on growth, at least in the subset of children with mild-to-moderate CKD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,392,233
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,087
of 6,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,387
of 357,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.