↓ Skip to main content

Preterm Hypoxic–Ischemic Encephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preterm Hypoxic–Ischemic Encephalopathy
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, October 2016
DOI 10.3389/fped.2016.00114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krishna Revanna Gopagondanahalli, Jingang Li, Michael C. Fahey, Rod W. Hunt, Graham Jenkin, Suzanne L. Miller, Atul Malhotra

Abstract

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a recognizable and defined clinical syndrome in term infants that results from a severe or prolonged hypoxic-ischemic episode before or during birth. However, in the preterm infant, defining hypoxic-ischemic injury (HII), its clinical course, monitoring, and outcomes remains complex. Few studies examine preterm HIE, and these are heterogeneous, with variable inclusion criteria and outcomes reported. We examine the available evidence that implies that the incidence of hypoxic-ischemic insult in preterm infants is probably higher than recognized and follows a more complex clinical course, with higher rates of adverse neurological outcomes, compared to term infants. This review aims to elucidate the causes and consequences of preterm hypoxia-ischemia, the subsequent clinical encephalopathy syndrome, diagnostic tools, and outcomes. Finally, we suggest a uniform definition for preterm HIE that may help in identifying infants most at risk of adverse outcomes and amenable to neuroprotective therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 188 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 60 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 36%
Neuroscience 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 69 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,596,400
of 23,659,844 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,723
of 6,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,568
of 317,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,659,844 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.