↓ Skip to main content

MLL-Rearranged Leukemias—An Update on Science and Clinical Approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
310 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
487 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MLL-Rearranged Leukemias—An Update on Science and Clinical Approaches
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fped.2017.00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda C. Winters, Kathrin M. Bernt

Abstract

The mixed-lineage leukemia 1 (MLL1) gene (now renamed Lysine [K]-specific MethylTransferase 2A or KMT2A) on chromosome 11q23 is disrupted in a unique group of acute leukemias. More than 80 different partner genes in these fusions have been described, although the majority of leukemias result from MLL1 fusions with one of about six common partner genes. Approximately 10% of all leukemias harbor MLL1 translocations. Of these, two patient populations comprise the majority of cases: patients younger than 1 year of age at diagnosis (primarily acute lymphoblastic leukemias) and young- to-middle-aged adults (primarily acute myeloid leukemias). A much rarer subgroup of patients with MLL1 rearrangements develop leukemia that is attributable to prior treatment with certain chemotherapeutic agents-so-called therapy-related leukemias. In general, outcomes for all of these patients remain poor when compared to patients with non-MLL1 rearranged leukemias. In this review, we will discuss the normal biological roles of MLL1 and its fusion partners, how these roles are hypothesized to be dysregulated in the context of MLL1 rearrangements, and the clinical manifestations of this group of leukemias. We will go on to discuss the progress in clinical management and promising new avenues of research, which may lead to more effective targeted therapies for affected patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 485 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 20%
Researcher 59 12%
Student > Bachelor 59 12%
Student > Master 53 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 64 13%
Unknown 134 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 151 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 69 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 3%
Other 44 9%
Unknown 149 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,192,905
of 24,605,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#350
of 7,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,213
of 429,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,605,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.