↓ Skip to main content

Cerebral Palsy—Trends in Epidemiology and Recent Development in Prenatal Mechanisms of Disease, Treatment, and Prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
773 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebral Palsy—Trends in Epidemiology and Recent Development in Prenatal Mechanisms of Disease, Treatment, and Prevention
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fped.2017.00021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moshe Stavsky, Omer Mor, Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia, Shirley Greenbaum, Nandor Gabor Than, Offer Erez

Abstract

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common motor disability in childhood. This syndrome is the manifestation of intrauterine pathologies, intrapartum complications, and the postnatal sequel, especially among preterm neonates. A double hit model theory is proposed suggesting that an intrauterine condition along with intrapartum or postnatal insult lead to the development of CP. Recent reports demonstrated that treatment during the process of preterm birth such as magnesium sulfate and postnatal modalities such as cooling may prevent or reduce the prevalence of this syndrome. Moreover, animal models demonstrated that postnatal treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs coupled with nanoparticles may affect the course of the disease in pups with neuroinflammation. This review will describe the changes in the epidemiology of this disease, the underlying prenatal mechanisms, and possible treatments that may reduce the prevalence of CP and alter the course of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 773 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 773 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 143 18%
Student > Master 97 13%
Researcher 43 6%
Student > Postgraduate 42 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 4%
Other 104 13%
Unknown 310 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 171 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 123 16%
Neuroscience 38 5%
Engineering 33 4%
Psychology 17 2%
Other 67 9%
Unknown 324 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,283,430
of 24,578,676 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#368
of 7,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,729
of 435,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#4
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,578,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.