↓ Skip to main content

Early Childhood Caries: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
337 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1348 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early Childhood Caries: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Prevention
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fped.2017.00157
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sukumaran Anil, Pradeep S. Anand

Abstract

Early childhood caries (ECC) is major oral health problem, mainly in socially disadvantaged populations. ECC affects infants and preschool children worldwide. The prevalence of ECC differs according to the group examined, and a prevalence of up to 85% has been reported for disadvantaged groups. ECC is the presence of one or more decayed, missing, or filled primary teeth in children aged 71 months (5 years) or younger. It begins with white-spot lesions in the upper primary incisors along the margin of the gingiva. If the disease continues, caries can progress, leading to complete destruction of the crown. The main risk factors in the development of ECC can be categorized as microbiological, dietary, and environmental risk factors. Even though it is largely a preventable condition, ECC remains one of the most common childhood diseases. The major contributing factors for the for the high prevalence of ECC are improper feeding practices, familial socioeconomic background, lack of parental education, and lack of access to dental care. Oral health plays an important role in children to maintain the oral functions and is required for eating, speech development, and a positive self-image. The review will focus on the prevalence, risk factors, and preventive strategies and the management of ECC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1348 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 204 15%
Student > Master 139 10%
Student > Postgraduate 64 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 3%
Other 163 12%
Unknown 690 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 505 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 1%
Social Sciences 13 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 <1%
Other 53 4%
Unknown 708 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,759,970
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#271
of 7,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,445
of 329,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#7
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.