↓ Skip to main content

Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fped.2017.00161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally J. Lawrence, Manish Sadarangani, Kevan Jacobson

Abstract

Immunosuppressive therapy is a known risk factor for opportunistic infections. We report the first case of severe Pneumocystis jirovecii infection requiring intensive care in a pediatric patient with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The literature was reviewed and there were 92 reported cases of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in patients with IBD. Most sources were case reports and there was likely reporting bias toward patients receiving immunomodulators, anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy, and those who died. Overall, 56% of patients were males and 58% had Crohn's disease. The median age was 45 years (interquartile range 30-68, range 8-78) and 86% of patients were lymphopenic. The case-fatality rate was 23%. Corticosteroids were used as IBD treatment in 88% of patients who subsequently developed PCP, 42% received thiopurines, 44% used anti-TNF therapy, and 15% received either cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Rates of mono, dual, triple, and quadruple immunosuppression therapy were 35, 35, 29, and 2%, respectively. This report highlights the importance of considering PCP in immunosuppressed lymphopenic pediatric IBD patients who present with unusual symptoms. Moreover, it should give gastroenterologists the impetus to limit immunosuppressive therapy to its minimal effective dose and consider options such as exclusive enteral nutrition wherever possible. Although there is no place for global PCP prophylaxis in IBD given the low incidence, in an era when there is increasing use of biologic agents with combination immunosuppressive therapy, the risk-benefit profile of PCP chemoprophylaxis should be revisited in selected cohorts such as patients on triple immunosuppression with corticosteroids, thiopurines, and a biological agent or calcineurin inhibitor, especially in lymphopenic individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,906,525
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,942
of 6,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,257
of 316,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#42
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.