↓ Skip to main content

Application of a New Established System for Toxic Doses in Children With 4-Hydroxycoumarin Rodenticide Intoxication

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of a New Established System for Toxic Doses in Children With 4-Hydroxycoumarin Rodenticide Intoxication
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fped.2018.00141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Ye, Zheng Wang, Hui Zhang, Hui Guo, Yannan Guo, Lina Chen

Abstract

The toxic dose of rodenticides in children is extremely difficult to be determined because of the uncertain exposure history. We established and validated a method to identify the toxic dose in children of 4-hydroxycoumarin (TDCH). Items were selected by Delphi method and weighted by analytic hierarchy process. Toxic doses were classified into three categories: high dose (>24 points), medium (15-24) and low (<15). Sixty-five children with 4-hydroxycoumarin rodenticide intoxication were included in the study. There were 29(44.6%), 8(12.3%), 28(43.1%) cases in high, medium, and low dose respectively. Patients in high-dose were more likely to have intentionally attempted suicide (5/29, 17.2%) or had no definite history of ingestion (17/29, 58.6%), arrived at the hospital later than 24 h (26/29, 90%), been misdiagnosed initially (25/29, 86.2%), not treated by gastric lavage (27/29, 93.1%), and developed severe hemorrhage. While most patients in low-dose were younger than 6 years (26/28, 92.9%), all have experienced accidental exposure, arrived at the hospital, and received gastric lavage within 24 h, obtained a definite diagnosis, and be asymptomatic. Of 38 patients arrived at hospital within 48 h, patients a score48h ≥ 15 had higher incidence of coagulopathy (6/8, 75.0%) than patients with a score48h < 15 (3/30, 10.0%). Of all patients, 37 in the high and medium dose with a score ≥ 15 has higher incidence (35/37, 94.6%) of prolonged administration with vitamin K1 (≥1 month) than other 28 patients with a score < 15 (0/28, 0%). The TDCH system could not only be used in evaluating toxic doses and predicting coagulopathy in the early stage, but also helps to guide appropriate treatment. Patients with a score48h ≥ 15 were in the high bleeding risk category. And patients with a scores ≥ 15 required treatment with vitamin K1 for more than a month.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Psychology 2 18%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,490,417
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#4,221
of 6,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,319
of 326,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#96
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.