↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of Hearing Impairment Among High-Risk Newborns in Ibadan, Nigeria

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of Hearing Impairment Among High-Risk Newborns in Ibadan, Nigeria
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fped.2018.00194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adeyemi A. Labaeka, Olukemi O. Tongo, Babatunde O. Ogunbosi, James A. Fasunla

Abstract

The burden of severe hearing impairment is increasing with two-thirds of these hearing impaired people residing in developing countries. Newborn hearing screening helps to identify early, babies who need intervention in order to prevent future disability. Neither universal nor targeted hearing screening programme is available in Nigeria. Objectives: This study was carried out to assess the prevalence of hearing impairment among high-risk newborns in UCH and the associated risk factors. Materials and Methods: Two hundred one newborns in the neonatal unit of UCH with risk factors for hearing impairment had hearing screening done using automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) at 30, 45, and 70 dB at admission and discharge, and those that failed screening at discharge were rescreened at 6 weeks post-discharge. Results: Eighty-three (41.3%) and 32 (15.9%) high-risk newborns failed at admission and discharge screening respectively, and 19 (9.5%) still failed at follow up screening. The majority of hearing loss at follow up was bilateral (94.7%) and severe (52.6%). The risk factors associated with persistent hearing loss at follow up were acute bilirubin encephalopathy (RR = 11.2, CI: 1.4-90.6), IVH (RR = 8.8, CI: 1.1-71.8), meningitis (RR = 4.8, CI: 1.01-29), recurrent apnoea (RR = 2.7, CI: 1.01-7.3), severe perinatal asphyxia NNE III (RR = 7, CI: 2.4-20.2). Conclusion: Severe and bilateral hearing impairment is a common complication among high risk newborns in UCH persisting till 6 weeks post-neonatal care. Severe perinatal asphyxia with NNE III, ABE, IVH, meningitis and administration of amikacin for more than 5 days were significant risk factors. We recommend that SCBU graduates with these risk factors should have mandatory audiologic evaluation at discharge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 14%
Student > Master 7 10%
Unspecified 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 25 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 42%
Unspecified 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 27 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3,436
of 6,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,128
of 326,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#62
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.