↓ Skip to main content

Immunomodulation to Prevent or Treat Neonatal Sepsis: Past, Present, and Future

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunomodulation to Prevent or Treat Neonatal Sepsis: Past, Present, and Future
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fped.2018.00199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone S. Schüller, Boris W. Kramer, Eduardo Villamor, Andreas Spittler, Angelika Berger, Ofer Levy

Abstract

Despite continued advances in neonatal medicine, sepsis remains a leading cause of death worldwide in neonatal intensive care units. The clinical presentation of sepsis in neonates varies markedly from that in older children and adults, and distinct acute inflammatory responses results in age-specific inflammatory and protective immune response to infection. This review first provides an overview of the neonatal immune system, then covers current mainstream, and experimental preventive and adjuvant therapies in neonatal sepsis. We also discuss how the distinct physiology of the perinatal period shapes early life immune responses and review strategies to reduce neonatal sepsis-related morbidity and mortality. A summary of studies that characterize immune ontogeny and neonatal sepsis is presented, followed by discussion of clinical trials assessing interventions such as breast milk, lactoferrin, probiotics, and pentoxifylline. Finally, we critically appraise future treatment options such as stem cell therapy, other antimicrobial protein and peptides, and targeting of pattern recognition receptors in an effort to prevent and/or treat sepsis in this highly vulnerable neonatal population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 42 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 45 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,088,626
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,210
of 7,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,743
of 341,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#29
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.