↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Homozygous JAK3 Mutation Leading to T-B+NK– SCID in Two Brazilian Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel Homozygous JAK3 Mutation Leading to T-B+NK– SCID in Two Brazilian Patients
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fped.2018.00230
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucila A. Barreiros, Gesmar R. S. Segundo, Anete S. Grumach, Pérsio Roxo-Júnior, Troy R. Torgerson, Hans D. Ochs, Antonio Condino-Neto

Abstract

We report a novel homozygous JAK3 mutation in two female Brazilian SCID infants from two unrelated kindreds. Patient 1 was referred at 2 months of age due to a family history of immunodeficiency and the appearance of a facial rash. The infant was screened for TRECs (T-cell receptor excision circles) and KRECs (kappa-deleting recombination excision circles) for the assessment of newly formed naïve T and B cells respectively, which showed undetectable TRECs and normal numbers of KRECs. Lymphocyte immunophenotyping by flow cytometry confirmed the screening results, revealing a T-B+NK- SCID. The patient underwent successful HSCT. Patient 2 was admitted to an intensive care unit at 8 months of age with severe pneumonia, BCGosis, and oral moniliasis; she also had a positive family history for SCID but newborn screening was not performed at birth. At 10 months of age she was diagnosed as a T-B+NK- SCID and underwent successful HSCT. JAK3 sequencing revealed the same homozygous missense mutation (c.2350G>A) in both patients. This mutation affects the last nucleotide of exon 17 and it is predicted to disrupt the donor splice site. cDNA sequencing revealed skipping of exon 17 missing in both patients, confirming the predicted effect on mRNA splicing. Skipping of exon 17 leads to an out of frame deletion of 151 nucleotides, frameshift and creation of a new stop codon 60 amino acids downstream of the mutation resulting in a truncated protein which is likely nonfunctional.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,987,988
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,986
of 6,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,578
of 333,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#49
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.