You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Protocol for a Longitudinal Cohort Study Employing Systems Biology to Identify Markers of Vaccine Immunogenicity in Newborn Infants in The Gambia and Papua New Guinea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2020.00197 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olubukola T. Idoko, Kinga K. Smolen, Oghenebrume Wariri, Abdulazeez Imam, Casey P. Shannon, Tida Dibassey, Joann Diray-Arce, Alansana Darboe, Julia Strandmark, Rym Ben-Othman, Oludare A. Odumade, Kerry McEnaney, Nelly Amenyogbe, William S. Pomat, Simon van Haren, Guzmán Sanchez-Schmitz, Ryan R. Brinkman, Hanno Steen, Robert E. W. Hancock, Scott J. Tebbutt, Peter C. Richmond, Anita H. J. van den Biggelaar, Tobias R. Kollmann, Ofer Levy, Al Ozonoff, Beate Kampmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Gambia | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,696,520
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#612
of 6,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,051
of 377,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#16
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.