↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Echocardiographic Evaluation of Transitional Circulation for the Neonatologists

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Echocardiographic Evaluation of Transitional Circulation for the Neonatologists
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fped.2020.600496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yogen Singh, Cécile Tissot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,656,702
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,742
of 6,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,893
of 506,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#102
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.