↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating Patients' and Neonatologists' Satisfaction With the Use of Telemedicine for Neonatology Prenatal Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating Patients' and Neonatologists' Satisfaction With the Use of Telemedicine for Neonatology Prenatal Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, March 2021
DOI 10.3389/fped.2021.642369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria C. Lapadula, Shanna Rolfs, Edgardo G. Szyld, Gene Hallford, Tracie Clark, Mike McCoy, Stephanie McKnight, Abhishek Makkar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Professor 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 40 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Design 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 41 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,241,069
of 26,112,783 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,432
of 8,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,005
of 456,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#103
of 334 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,112,783 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 334 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.