You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Best Practice Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Children With Pediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome Temporally Associated With SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS; Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children, MIS-C) in Switzerland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2021.667507 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luregn J. Schlapbach, Maya C. Andre, Serge Grazioli, Nina Schöbi, Nicole Ritz, Christoph Aebi, Philipp Agyeman, Manuela Albisetti, Douggl G. N. Bailey, Christoph Berger, Géraldine Blanchard-Rohner, Sabrina Bressieux-Degueldre, Michael Hofer, Arnaud G. L'Huillier, Mark Marston, Patrick M. Meyer Sauteur, Jana Pachlopnik Schmid, Marie-Helene Perez, Bjarte Rogdo, Johannes Trück, Andreas Woerner, Daniela Wütz, Petra Zimmermann, Michael Levin, Elizabeth Whittaker, Peter C. Rimensberger, the PIMS-TS working group of the Interest Group for Pediatric Neonatal Intensive Care of the Swiss Society of Intensive Care and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Group Switzerland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 9% |
| India | 2 | 6% |
| Portugal | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Georgia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 51% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 31% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 59 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 59 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2021.
All research outputs
#428,888
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#69
of 7,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,043
of 463,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#4
of 434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.