You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Supportive Care During Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Prevention of Infections. A Report From Workshops on Supportive Care of the Paediatric Diseases Working Party (PDWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2021.705179 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marianne Ifversen, Roland Meisel, Petr Sedlacek, Krzysztof Kalwak, Luisa Sisinni, Daphna Hutt, Thomas Lehrnbecher, Adriana Balduzzi, Tamara Diesch, Andrea Jarisch, Tayfun Güngör, Jerry Stein, Isaac Yaniv, Halvard Bonig, Michaela Kuhlen, Marc Ansari, Tiago Nava, Jean-Hugues Dalle, Cristina Diaz-de-Heredia, Eugenia Trigoso, Ulrike Falkenberg, Mihaela Hartmann, Marco Deiana, Marta Canesi, Chiara Broggi, Alice Bertaina, Brenda Gibson, Gergely Krivan, Kim Vettenranta, Toni Matic, Jochen Buechner, Anita Lawitschka, Christina Peters, Akif Yesilipek, Koray Yalçin, Giovanna Lucchini, Shahrzad Bakhtiar, Dominik Turkiewicz, Riitta Niinimäki, Jacek Wachowiak, Simone Cesaro, Arnaud Dalissier, Selim Corbacioglu, Andre Manfred Willasch, Peter Bader |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Finland | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,606
of 7,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,982
of 444,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#93
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.