↓ Skip to main content

Causes of Melena and Effective Examination Strategies in Children

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Causes of Melena and Effective Examination Strategies in Children
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fped.2021.780356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Itaru Iwama, Masashi Yoshida, Tomoko Hara, Ryusuke Nambu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Unspecified 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Unknown 17 74%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Unspecified 2 9%
Unknown 18 78%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#13,475,442
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,804
of 5,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,511
of 502,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#116
of 439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.