↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Paediatric Clinical Trial Characteristics and Activity Over 23 Years—Impact of the European Paediatric Regulation on a Single French Clinical Research Center

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of Paediatric Clinical Trial Characteristics and Activity Over 23 Years—Impact of the European Paediatric Regulation on a Single French Clinical Research Center
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, April 2022
DOI 10.3389/fped.2022.842480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna Arnadottir, François Luc, Florentia Kaguelidou, Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain, the Collaborative CIC1426 Investigator Group, Auvin, Auvin, Delorme, Vantalon, Lecen, eux, Carel, Tubiana, Bismuth, Baruchel, Dalle, Deschenes, Dalle, Hogan, C. Dossier, Kwon, Faye, Meinzer, Melki, Houdouin, Munck, Gerardin, Hugot, Vialla, Biran, Schmitz, El Ghoneimi, Dauger, Bourat, C. Alberti, S. Guilmin Crepon, O. Bourdon

Abstract

As unlicensed or off-label drugs are frequently prescribed in children, the European Pediatric Regulation came into force in 2007 to improve the safe use of medicinal products in the pediatric population. This present report analyzes the pediatric research trials over 23 years in a clinical research center dedicated to children and the impact of regulation. The database of trial characteristics from 1998 to 2020 was analyzed. We also searched for differences between two periods (1998-2006 and 2007-2020) and between institutional and industrial sponsors during the whole period (1998-2020). A total of 379 pediatric trials were initiated at our center, corresponding to inclusion of 7955 subjects and 19448 on-site patient visits. The trials were predominantly drug evaluation trials (n = 278, 73%), sponsored by industries (n = 216, 57%) or government/non-profit institutions (n = 163, 43%). All age groups and most subspecialties were concerned. We noted an important and regular increase in the number of trials conducted over the years, with an increased number of multinational, industrially sponsored trials. Based on the data presented, areas of improvement are discussed: (1) following ethical and regulatory approval depending on the sponsor, the mean time needed for administrative and financial agreement, validation of trial procedures allowing trial initiation at the level of the center was 6.3 and 6.5 months (periods 1 and 2, respectively) and should be reduced, (2) availability of expert research teams remain insufficient, time dedicated to research attributed to physicians should be organized and recognition of research nurses is required. The positive impact of the European Pediatric Regulation highlights the need to increase the availability of trained research teams, organized within identified multicenter international pediatric research networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#18,649,743
of 23,932,398 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3,223
of 6,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,846
of 446,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#274
of 529 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,932,398 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 529 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.