↓ Skip to main content

Case report: Cochlear implantation was effective for progressive bilateral severe hearing loss associated with Kawasaki disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Case report: Cochlear implantation was effective for progressive bilateral severe hearing loss associated with Kawasaki disease
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fped.2023.1199240
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daichi Murakami, Takahito Kimura, Masamitsu Kono, Akihiro Sakai, Tomohiro Suenaga, Masanobu Hiraoka, Hideki Sakatani, Makiko Ohtani, Hiroyuki Suzuki, Daisuke Tokuhara, Muneki Hotomi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#19,891,745
of 24,447,003 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3,908
of 7,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,871
of 292,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#91
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,447,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.