You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Opinion: The optimal use of risk factors to guide palivizumab prophylaxis against severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in moderate-to-late preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2024.1343960 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bosco Paes, Marcello Lanari, Barry Rodgers-Gray, John Fullarton, Xavier Carbonell-Estrany |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,627,385
of 25,250,629 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#2,772
of 7,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,596
of 224,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#45
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,250,629 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.