↓ Skip to main content

Impact of pharmaceutical validation on prescribing errors in a neonatal intensive care unit. Randomised and controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of pharmaceutical validation on prescribing errors in a neonatal intensive care unit. Randomised and controlled study
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fped.2024.1346090
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. D. Canales-Siguero, C. García-Muñoz, J. M. Caro-Teller, S. Piris-Borregas, S. Martín-Aragón, J. M. Ferrari-Piquero, M. T. Moral-Pumarega, C. R. Pallás-Alonso

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,851,135
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#476
of 7,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,376
of 226,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#3
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.