You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Two compound heterozygous variants in the CLN8 gene are responsible for neuronal cereidolipofuscinoses disorder in a child: a case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fped.2024.1379254 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Federico Baltar, Camila Simoes, Francisco Garagorry, Martín Graña, Soledad Rodríguez, María Haydée Aunchayna, Alejandra Tapié, Alfredo Cerisola, Gabriel González, Hugo Naya, Lucía Spangenberg, Víctor Raggio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,138,680
of 25,898,387 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#1,515
of 7,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,361
of 187,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#8
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,898,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.