↓ Skip to main content

Navigating cholestasis: identifying inborn errors of bile acid metabolism for precision diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pediatrics, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Navigating cholestasis: identifying inborn errors of bile acid metabolism for precision diagnosis
Published in
Frontiers in Pediatrics, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fped.2024.1385970
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Nittono, Mitsuyoshi Suzuki, Hiromi Suzuki, Satoru Sugimoto, Jun Mori, Rieko Sakamoto, Yugo Takaki, Hisamitsu Hayashi, Hajime Takei, Akihiko Kimura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,982,612
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#4,267
of 7,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,508
of 223,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#62
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.