↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Novel CYP2D7-2D6 Hybrids: Non-Functional and Functional Variants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Novel CYP2D7-2D6 Hybrids: Non-Functional and Functional Variants
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2010.00121
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Gaedigk, Lazara Karelia Montane Jaime, Joseph S. Bertino, Anick Bérard, Victoria M. Pratt, L. DiAnne Bradfordand, J. Steven Leeder

Abstract

Polymorphic expression of CYP2D6 contributes to the wide range of activity observed for this clinically important drug metabolizing enzyme. In this report we describe novel CYP2D7/2D6 hybrid genes encoding non-functional and functional CYP2D6 protein and a CYP2D7 variant that mimics a CYP2D7/2D6 hybrid gene. Five-kilobyte-long PCR products encompassing the novel genes were entirely sequenced. A quantitative assay probing in different gene regions was employed to determine CYP2D6 and 2D7 copy number variations and the relative position of the hybrid genes within the locus was assessed by long-range PCR. In addition to the previously known CYP2D6*13 and *66 hybrids, we describe three novel non-functional CYP2D7-2D6 hybrids with gene switching in exon 2 (CYP2D6*79), intron 2 (CYP2D6*80), and intron 5 (CYP2D6*67). A CYP2D7-specific T-ins in exon 1 causes a detrimental frame shift. One subject revealed a CYP2D7 conversion in the 5'-flanking region of a CYP2D6*35 allele, was otherwise unaffected (designated CYP2D6*35B). Finally, three DNAs revealed a CYP2D7 gene with a CYP2D6-like region downstream of exon 9 (designated CYP2D7[REP6]). Quantitative copy number determination, sequence analyses, and long-range PCR mapping were in agreement and excluded the presence of additional gene units. Undetected hybrid genes may cause over-estimation of CYP2D6 activity (CYP2D6*1/*1 vs *1/hybrid, etc), but may also cause results that may interfere with the genotype determination. Detection of hybrid events, "single" and tandem, will contribute to more accurate phenotype prediction from genotype data.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Other 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 10%
Chemistry 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2010.
All research outputs
#15,271,909
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#6,325
of 15,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,145
of 163,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,939 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.