↓ Skip to main content

Recent Developments Regarding Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers for the Treatment of Inherited and Acquired Neuropathic Pain Syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recent Developments Regarding Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers for the Treatment of Inherited and Acquired Neuropathic Pain Syndromes
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2011.00054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan W. Theile, Theodore R. Cummins

Abstract

Chronic and neuropathic pain constitute significant health problems affecting millions of individuals each year. Pain sensations typically originate in sensory neurons of the peripheral nervous system which relay information to the central nervous system (CNS). Pathological pain sensations can arise as result of changes in excitability of these peripheral sensory neurons. Voltage-gated sodium channels are key determinants regulating action potential generation and propagation; thus, changes in sodium channel function can have profound effects on neuronal excitability and pain signaling. At present, most of the clinically available sodium channel blockers used to treat pain are non-selective across sodium channel isoforms and can contribute to cardio-toxicity, motor impairments, and CNS side effects. Numerous strides have been made over the last decade in an effort to develop more selective and efficacious sodium channel blockers to treat pain. The purpose of this review is to highlight some of the more recent developments put forth by research universities and pharmaceutical companies alike in the pursuit of developing more targeted sodium channel therapies for the treatment of a variety of neuropathic pain conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 194 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Student > Master 18 9%
Other 11 5%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 28%
Neuroscience 27 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 35 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,314,922
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,082
of 15,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,967
of 180,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#33
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.