↓ Skip to main content

CFTR and Ca2+ Signaling in Cystic Fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CFTR and Ca2+ Signaling in Cystic Fibrosis
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2011.00067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabrice Antigny, Caroline Norez, Frédéric Becq, Clarisse Vandebrouck

Abstract

Among the diverse physiological functions exerted by calcium signaling in living cells, its role in the regulation of protein biogenesis and trafficking remains incompletely understood. In cystic fibrosis (CF) disease the most common CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutation, F508del-CFTR generates a misprocessed protein that is abnormally retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) compartment, rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway and hence absent at the plasma membrane of CF epithelial cells. Recent studies have demonstrated that intracellular calcium signals consequent to activation of apical G-protein-coupled receptors by different agonists are increased in CF airway epithelia. Moreover, the regulation of various intracellular calcium storage compartments, such as ER is also abnormal in CF cells. Although the molecular mechanism at the origin of this increase remains puzzling in epithelial cells, the F508del-CFTR mutation is proposed to be the onset of abnormal Ca(2+) influx linking the calcium signaling to CFTR pathobiology. This article reviews the relationships between CFTR and calcium signaling in the context of the genetic disease CF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Engineering 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2012.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,472
of 19,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,512
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#38
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.