↓ Skip to main content

Microglial Activation – Tuning and Pruning Adult Neurogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microglial Activation – Tuning and Pruning Adult Neurogenesis
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2012.00041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine T. Ekdahl

Abstract

NEW NEURONS ARE CONTINUOUSLY GENERATED IN TWO ADULT BRAIN REGIONS: the subgranular zone of the hippocampus and the subependyma by the lateral ventricles, referred to as the neurogenic niches. During their development from neural stem cells to mature functionally integrated neurons numerous choices are made, such as proliferation or quiescence, cell survival or death, migration or establishment, growth or retraction of processes, synaptic assembly or pruning, or tuning of synaptic transmission. The process is altered by physiological stimuli as well as several brain diseases. Microglia are located within the neurogenic niches and have become interesting candidates for modulating neurogenesis in both the healthy and injured brain. They become activated by foreign antigens or changes in the brain homeostasis and transform this innate immunity into an adaptive immune response by recruiting systemic immune cells. Most studies report an acute decrease in the survival of new neurons following this classically activated microglia reaction. The long-term effects are more complex. In neurodegenerative diseases, microglial activation is more heterogeneous and the transformation from a pro- to an anti-inflammatory cytokine profile and the deactivation of microglia is not well defined. The diversity is reflected by numerous reports describing both beneficial and detrimental effects on neurogenesis, primarily on the proliferation, survival, and cell fate. However, relatively few studies have investigated alterations at later stages of neurogenesis including the functional integration. Though likely, it is not established how a fine-tuned cross-talk between microglia and adult-born neurons would work and how it changes upon microglia activation. This review will therefore launch three hypotheses for how microglia might direct synaptic integration of newborn neurons, currently a fast expanding research field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 277 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 22%
Researcher 57 20%
Student > Bachelor 38 13%
Student > Master 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 42 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 32%
Neuroscience 70 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 2%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 50 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,811,512
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,604
of 16,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,578
of 246,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#89
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.