↓ Skip to main content

Pathophysiological Role of Omega Pore Current in Channelopathies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathophysiological Role of Omega Pore Current in Channelopathies
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2012.00112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Jurkat-Rott, James Groome, Frank Lehmann-Horn

Abstract

In voltage-gated cation channels, a recurrent pattern for mutations is the neutralization of positively charged residues in the voltage-sensing S4 transmembrane segments. These mutations cause dominant ion channelopathies affecting many tissues such as brain, heart, and skeletal muscle. Recent studies suggest that the pathogenesis of associated phenotypes is not limited to alterations in the gating of the ion-conducting alpha pore. Instead, aberrant so-called omega currents, facilitated by the movement of mutated S4 segments, also appear to contribute to symptoms. Surprisingly, these omega currents conduct cations with varying ion selectivity and are activated in either a hyperpolarized or depolarized voltage range. This review gives an overview of voltage sensor channelopathies in general and focuses on pathogenesis of skeletal muscle S4 disorders for which current knowledge is most advanced.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
France 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 30%
Researcher 17 25%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Chemistry 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2012.
All research outputs
#5,867,780
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,262
of 15,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,419
of 244,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#30
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,981 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.