↓ Skip to main content

The Yin and Yang of Nicotine: Harmful during Development, Beneficial in Adult Patient Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Yin and Yang of Nicotine: Harmful during Development, Beneficial in Adult Patient Populations
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2012.00180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle S. Counotte, August B. Smit, Sabine Spijker

Abstract

Nicotine has remarkably diverse effects on the brain. Being the main active compound in tobacco, nicotine can aversively affect brain development. However, it has the ability to act positively by restoring attentional capabilities in smokers. Here, we focus on nicotine exposure during the prenatal and adolescent developmental periods and specifically, we will review the long-lasting effects of nicotine on attention, both in humans and animal models. We discuss the reciprocal relation of the beneficial effects of nicotine, improving attention in smokers and in patients with neuropsychiatric diseases, such as schizophrenia and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, vs. nicotine-related attention deficits already caused during adolescence. Given the need for research on the mechanisms of nicotine's cognitive actions, we discuss some of the recent work performed in animals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 20%
Researcher 9 15%
Unspecified 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 22%
Unspecified 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2013.
All research outputs
#6,112,503
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,406
of 15,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,990
of 244,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#31
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,851 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.