↓ Skip to main content

The Discovery of Dabigatran Etexilate

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Discovery of Dabigatran Etexilate
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2013.00012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne van Ryn, Ashley Goss, Norbert Hauel, Wolfgang Wienen, Henning Priepke, Herbert Nar, Andreas Clemens

Abstract

Thromboembolic disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the developed world and is caused by an excessive stimulation of coagulation. Thrombin is a key serine protease in the coagulation cascade and numerous efforts have been made to develop safe and effective orally active direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). Current anticoagulant therapy includes the use of indirect thrombin inhibitors (e.g., heparins, low-molecular-weight-heparins) and vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin. However there are several caveats in the clinical use of these agents including narrow therapeutic window, parenteral delivery, and food- and drug-drug interactions. Dabigatran is a synthetic, reversible DTI with high affinity and specificity for its target binding both free and clot-bound thrombin, and offers a favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Large randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that dabigatran provides comparable or superior thromboprophylaxis in multiple thromboembolic disease indications compared to standard of care. This minireview will highlight the discovery and development of dabigatran, the first in a class of new oral anticoagulant agents to be licensed worldwide for the prevention of thromboembolism in the setting of orthopedic surgery and stroke prevent in atrial fibrillation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 87 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Chemistry 5 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#18,329,207
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,105
of 15,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,972
of 280,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#85
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,904 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.