↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms and insights into drug resistance in cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
529 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
783 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanisms and insights into drug resistance in cancer
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2013.00028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiba Zahreddine, Katherine L. B. Borden

Abstract

Cancer drug resistance continues to be a major impediment in medical oncology. Clinically, resistance can arise prior to or as a result of cancer therapy. In this review, we discuss different mechanisms adapted by cancerous cells to resist treatment, including alteration in drug transport and metabolism, mutation and amplification of drug targets, as well as genetic rewiring which can lead to impaired apoptosis. Tumor heterogeneity may also contribute to resistance, where small subpopulations of cells may acquire or stochastically already possess some of the features enabling them to emerge under selective drug pressure. Making the problem even more challenging, some of these resistance pathways lead to multidrug resistance, generating an even more difficult clinical problem to overcome. We provide examples of these mechanisms and some insights into how understanding these processes can influence the next generation of cancer therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 783 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 772 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 167 21%
Student > Master 125 16%
Student > Bachelor 99 13%
Researcher 59 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 6%
Other 115 15%
Unknown 171 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 193 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 144 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 75 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 50 6%
Chemistry 49 6%
Other 81 10%
Unknown 191 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,834,185
of 24,452,844 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,138
of 18,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,328
of 289,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#16
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,452,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.