↓ Skip to main content

Traditional medicines and globalization: current and future perspectives in ethnopharmacology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
432 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Traditional medicines and globalization: current and future perspectives in ethnopharmacology
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2013.00092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Leonti, Laura Casu

Abstract

The ethnopharmacological approach toward the understanding and appraisal of traditional and herbal medicines is characterized by the inclusions of the social as well as the natural sciences. Anthropological field-observations describing the local use of nature-derived medicines are the basis for ethnopharmacological enquiries. The multidisciplinary scientific validation of indigenous drugs is of relevance to modern societies at large and helps to sustain local health care practices. Especially with respect to therapies related to aging related, chronic and infectious diseases traditional medicines offer promising alternatives to biomedicine. Bioassays applied in ethnopharmacology represent the molecular characteristics and complexities of the disease or symptoms for which an indigenous drug is used in "traditional" medicine to variable depth and extent. One-dimensional in vitro approaches rarely cope with the complexity of human diseases and ignore the concept of polypharmacological synergies. The recent focus on holistic approaches and systems biology in medicinal plant research represents the trend toward the description and the understanding of complex multi-parameter systems. Ethnopharmacopoeias are non-static cultural constructs shaped by belief and knowledge systems. Intensified globalization and economic liberalism currently accelerates the interchange between local and global pharmacopoeias via international trade, television, the World Wide Web and print media. The increased infiltration of newly generated biomedical knowledge and introduction of "foreign" medicines into local pharmacopoeias leads to syncretic developments and generates a feedback loop. While modern and post-modern cultures and knowledge systems adapt and transform the global impact, they become more relevant for ethnopharmacology. Moreover, what is traditional, alternative or complementary medicine depends on the adopted historic-cultural perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Honduras 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Mauritius 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 423 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 14%
Researcher 51 12%
Student > Master 48 11%
Student > Bachelor 44 10%
Other 22 5%
Other 79 18%
Unknown 128 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 52 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 9%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 4%
Other 87 20%
Unknown 144 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,155,706
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,776
of 15,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,312
of 280,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#23
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,941 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.