↓ Skip to main content

Anti-cancer activities of pH- or heat-modified pectin

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-cancer activities of pH- or heat-modified pectin
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2013.00128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lionel Leclere, Pierre Van Cutsem, Carine Michiels

Abstract

Despite enormous efforts that have been made in the search for novel drugs and treatments, cancer continues to be a major public health problem. Moreover, the emergence of resistance to cancer chemotherapy often prevents complete remission. Researchers have thus turned to natural products mainly from plant origin to circumvent resistance. Pectin and pH- or heat-modified pectin have demonstrated chemopreventive and antitumoral activities against some aggressive and recurrent cancers. The focus of this review is to describe how pectin and modified pectin display these activities and what are the possible underlying mechanisms. The failure of conventional chemotherapy to reduce mortality as well as serious side effects make natural products, such as pectin-derived products, ideal candidates for exerting synergism in combination with conventional anticancer drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 264 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 17%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 63 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 20%
Chemistry 29 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 10%
Engineering 18 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 6%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 81 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,456,252
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#554
of 19,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,757
of 293,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.