↓ Skip to main content

Iron, hepcidin, and the metal connection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iron, hepcidin, and the metal connection
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2014.00128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivier Loréal, Thibault Cavey, Edouard Bardou-Jacquet, Pascal Guggenbuhl, Martine Ropert, Pierre Brissot

Abstract

Identification of new players in iron metabolism, such as hepcidin, which regulates ferroportin and divalent metal transporter 1 expression, has improved our knowledge of iron metabolism and iron-related diseases. However, from both experimental data and clinical findings, "iron-related proteins" appear to also be involved in the metabolism of other metals, especially divalent cations. Reports have demonstrated that some metals may affect, directly or indirectly, the expression of proteins involved in iron metabolism. Throughout their lives, individuals are exposed to various metals during personal and/or occupational activities. Therefore, better knowledge of the connections between iron and other metals could improve our understanding of iron-related diseases, especially the variability in phenotypic expression, as well as a variety of diseases in which iron metabolism is secondarily affected. Controlling the metabolism of other metals could represent a promising innovative therapeutic approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Chemistry 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,717,049
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,592
of 16,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,220
of 228,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#16
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,008 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.