↓ Skip to main content

Ca2+ current facilitation is CaMKII-dependent and has arrhythmogenic consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ca2+ current facilitation is CaMKII-dependent and has arrhythmogenic consequences
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2014.00144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald M. Bers, Stefano Morotti

Abstract

The cardiac voltage gated Ca(2+) current (ICa) is critical to the electrophysiological properties, excitation-contraction coupling, mitochondrial energetics, and transcriptional regulation in heart. Thus, it is not surprising that cardiac ICa is regulated by numerous pathways. This review will focus on changes in ICa that occur during the cardiac action potential (AP), with particular attention to Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation (CDI), Ca(2+)-dependent facilitation (CDF) and how calmodulin (CaM) and Ca(2+)-CaM dependent protein kinase (CaMKII) participate in the regulation of Ca(2+) current during the cardiac AP. CDI depends on CaM pre-bound to the C-terminal of the L-type Ca(2+) channel, such that Ca(2+) influx and Ca(2+) released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum bind to that CaM and cause CDI. In cardiac myocytes CDI normally pre-dominates over voltage-dependent inactivation. The decrease in ICa via CDI provides direct negative feedback on the overall Ca(2+) influx during a single beat, when myocyte Ca(2+) loading is high. CDF builds up over several beats, depends on CaMKII-dependent Ca(2+) channel phosphorylation, and results in a staircase of increasing ICa peak, with progressively slower inactivation. CDF and CDI co-exist and in combination may fine-tune the ICa waveform during the cardiac AP. CDF may partially compensate for the tendency for Ca(2+) channel availability to decrease at higher heart rates because of accumulating inactivation. CDF may also allow some reactivation of ICa during long duration cardiac APs, and contribute to early afterdepolarizations, a form of triggered arrhythmias.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 32%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Engineering 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,576
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,173
of 16,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,802
of 228,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#52
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,009 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.