↓ Skip to main content

Opioid receptor desensitization: mechanisms and its link to tolerance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Opioid receptor desensitization: mechanisms and its link to tolerance
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2014.00280
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéphane Allouche, Florence Noble, Nicolas Marie

Abstract

Opioid receptors (OR) are part of the class A of G-protein coupled receptors and the target of the opiates, the most powerful analgesic molecules used in clinic. During a protracted use, a tolerance to analgesic effect develops resulting in a reduction of the effectiveness. So understanding mechanisms of tolerance is a great challenge and may help to find new strategies to tackle this side effect. This review will summarize receptor-related mechanisms that could underlie tolerance especially receptor desensitization. We will focus on the latest data obtained on molecular mechanisms involved in opioid receptor desensitization: phosphorylation, receptor uncoupling, internalization, and post-endocytic fate of the receptor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 253 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 20%
Student > Bachelor 41 16%
Student > Master 35 14%
Researcher 18 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 4%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 69 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 16%
Neuroscience 31 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 11%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 78 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,145,071
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,363
of 19,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,077
of 362,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.