↓ Skip to main content

Modulation of cellular signaling by herpesvirus-encoded G protein-coupled receptors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modulation of cellular signaling by herpesvirus-encoded G protein-coupled receptors
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2015.00040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabrina M de Munnik, Martine J Smit, Rob Leurs, Henry F Vischer

Abstract

Human herpesviruses (HHVs) are widespread infectious pathogens that have been associated with proliferative and inflammatory diseases. During viral evolution, HHVs have pirated genes encoding viral G protein-coupled receptors (vGPCRs), which are expressed on infected host cells. These vGPCRs show highest homology to human chemokine receptors, which play a key role in the immune system. Importantly, vGPCRs have acquired unique properties such as constitutive activity and the ability to bind a broad range of human chemokines. This allows vGPCRs to hijack human proteins and modulate cellular signaling for the benefit of the virus, ultimately resulting in immune evasion and viral dissemination to establish a widespread and lifelong infection. Knowledge on the mechanisms by which herpesviruses reprogram cellular signaling might provide insight in the contribution of vGPCRs to viral survival and herpesvirus-associated pathologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,085,608
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,130
of 19,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,777
of 274,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#13
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.