You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recent advances in circadian rhythms in cardiovascular system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2015.00071 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lihong Chen, Guangrui Yang |
| Abstract |
Growing evidence shows that intrinsic circadian clocks are tightly related to cardiovascular functions. The diurnal changes in blood pressure and heart rate are well known circadian rhythms. Endothelial function, platelet aggregation and thrombus formation exhibit circadian changes as well. The onset of many cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) or events, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, arrhythmia, and sudden cardiac death, also exhibits temporal trends. Furthermore, there is strong evidence from animal models and epidemiological studies showing that disruption of circadian rhythms is a significant risk factor for many CVDs, and the intervention of CVDs may have a time dependent effect. In this mini review, we summarized recent advances in our understanding of the relationship between circadian rhythm and cardiovascular physiology and diseases including blood pressure regulation and myocardial infarction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 18 | 35% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 96% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 178 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 48 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 55 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#791,883
of 25,670,640 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#302
of 19,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,606
of 279,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,670,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.