↓ Skip to main content

Stabilization of G protein-coupled receptors by point mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stabilization of G protein-coupled receptors by point mutations
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2015.00082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franziska M. Heydenreich, Ziva Vuckovic, Milos Matkovic, Dmitry B. Veprintsev

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are flexible integral membrane proteins involved in transmembrane signaling. Their involvement in many physiological processes makes them interesting targets for drug development. Determination of the structure of these receptors will help to design more specific drugs, however, their structural characterization has so far been hampered by the low expression and their inherent instability in detergents which made protein engineering indispensable for structural and biophysical characterization. Several approaches to stabilize the receptors in a particular conformation have led to breakthroughs in GPCR structure determination. These include truncations of the flexible regions, stabilization by antibodies and nanobodies, fusion partners, high affinity and covalently bound ligands as well as conformational stabilization by mutagenesis. In this review we focus on stabilization of GPCRs by insertion of point mutations, which lead to increased conformational and thermal stability as well as improved expression levels. We summarize existing mutagenesis strategies with different coverage of GPCR sequence space and depth of information, design and transferability of mutations and the molecular basis for stabilization. We also discuss whether mutations alter the structure and pharmacological properties of GPCRs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 193 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 21%
Researcher 40 20%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 26 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 66 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 21%
Chemistry 21 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 34 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,952,277
of 22,799,071 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,872
of 16,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,659
of 264,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#19
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,799,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.