↓ Skip to main content

Mesothelial cells in tissue repair and fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mesothelial cells in tissue repair and fibrosis
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2015.00113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven E. Mutsaers, Kimberly Birnie, Sally Lansley, Sarah E. Herrick, Chuan-Bian Lim, Cecilia M. Prêle

Abstract

Mesothelial cells are fundamental to the maintenance of serosal integrity and homeostasis and play a critical role in normal serosal repair following injury. However, when normal repair mechanisms breakdown, mesothelial cells take on a profibrotic role, secreting inflammatory, and profibrotic mediators, differentiating and migrating into the injured tissues where they contribute to fibrogenesis. The development of new molecular and cell tracking techniques has made it possible to examine the origin of fibrotic cells within damaged tissues and to elucidate the roles they play in inflammation and fibrosis. In addition to secreting proinflammatory mediators and contributing to both coagulation and fibrinolysis, mesothelial cells undergo mesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition, a process analogous to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and become fibrogenic cells. Fibrogenic mesothelial cells have now been identified in tissues where they have not previously been thought to occur, such as within the parenchyma of the fibrotic lung. These findings show a direct role for mesothelial cells in fibrogenesis and open therapeutic strategies to prevent or reverse the fibrotic process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 310 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 78 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 10%
Researcher 27 9%
Student > Master 26 8%
Other 12 4%
Other 31 10%
Unknown 108 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 9%
Engineering 24 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 127 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,679,016
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,825
of 17,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,797
of 269,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#11
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.