↓ Skip to main content

Sonochemotherapy: From bench to bedside

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sonochemotherapy: From bench to bedside
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2015.00138
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lammertink, Bart, Bos, Clemens, Deckers, Roel, Storm, Gert, Moonen, Chrit, Escoffre, Jean-Michel, Lammertink, Bart H. A., Moonen, Chrit T. W.

Abstract

The combination of microbubbles and ultrasound has emerged as a promising method for local drug delivery. Microbubbles can be locally activated by a targeted ultrasound beam, which can result in several bio-effects. For drug delivery, microbubble-assisted ultrasound is used to increase vascular- and plasma membrane permeability for facilitating drug extravasation and the cellular uptake of drugs in the treated region, respectively. In the case of drug-loaded microbubbles, these two mechanisms can be combined with local release of the drug following destruction of the microbubble. The use of microbubble-assisted ultrasound to deliver chemotherapeutic agents is also referred to as sonochemotherapy. In this review, the basic principles of sonochemotherapy are discussed, including aspects such as the type of (drug-loaded) microbubbles used, the routes of administration used in vivo, ultrasound devices and parameters, treatment schedules and safety issues. Finally, the clinical translation of sonochemotherapy is discussed, including the first clinical study using sonochemotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 17 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 21 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#19,939,131
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,439
of 19,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,287
of 269,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#25
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.