↓ Skip to main content

Frog intestinal perfusion to evaluate drug permeability: application to p-gp and cyp3a4 substrates

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frog intestinal perfusion to evaluate drug permeability: application to p-gp and cyp3a4 substrates
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2015.00141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neelima Yerasi, Himabindu Vurimindi, Krishna Devarakonda

Abstract

To evaluate the reliability of using in situ frog intestinal perfusion technique for permeability assessment of carrier transported drugs which are also substrates for CYP enzymes. Single Pass Intestinal Perfusion (SPIP) studies were performed in frogs of the species Rana tigrina using established method for rats with some modifications after inducing anesthesia. Effective permeability coefficient (P eff) of losartan and midazolam was calculated in the presence and absence of inhibitors using the parallel-tube model. Peff of losartan when perfused alone was found to be 0.427 ± 0.27 × 10(-4)cm/s and when it was co-perfused with inhibitors, significant change in P eff was observed. Peff of midazolam when perfused alone was found to be 2.03 ± 0.07 × 10(-4)cm/s and when it was co-perfused with inhibitors, no significant change in P eff was observed. Comparison of P eff calculated in frog with that of other available models and also humans suggested that the P eff-values are comparable and reflected well with human intestinal permeability. It is possible to determine the P eff-value for compounds which are dual substrates of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 using in situ frog intestinal perfusion technique. The calculated P eff-values correlated well with reported P eff-values of probe drugs. comparison of the P eff-value of losartan obtained with that of reported human's P eff and Caco 2 cell data, and comparison of the P eff-value of midazolam with that of reported rat's P eff, we could conclude that SPIP from model can be reliably used in preclinical studies for permeability estimation. This model may represent a valuable alternative to the low speed and high cost of conventional animal models (typically rodents) for the assessment of intestinal permeability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 17%
Chemistry 3 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,282,766
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10,054
of 16,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,471
of 262,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#40
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,045 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.