↓ Skip to main content

β1 Integrins as Therapeutic Targets to Disrupt Hallmarks of Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
β1 Integrins as Therapeutic Targets to Disrupt Hallmarks of Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2015.00279
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Florence Blandin, Guillaume Renner, Maxime Lehmann, Isabelle Lelong-Rebel, Sophie Martin, Monique Dontenwill

Abstract

Integrins belong to a large family of αβ heterodimeric transmembrane proteins first recognized as adhesion molecules that bind to dedicated elements of the extracellular matrix and also to other surrounding cells. As important sensors of the cell microenvironment, they regulate numerous signaling pathways in response to structural variations of the extracellular matrix. Biochemical and biomechanical cues provided by this matrix and transmitted to cells via integrins are critically modified in tumoral settings. Integrins repertoire are subjected to expression level modifications, in tumor cells, and in surrounding cancer-associated cells, implicated in tumor initiation and progression as well. As critical players in numerous cancer hallmarks, defined by Hanahan and Weinberg (2011), integrins represent pertinent therapeutic targets. We will briefly summarize here our current knowledge about integrin implications in those different hallmarks focusing primarily on β1 integrins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 21%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 31 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,224,351
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,028
of 16,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,396
of 386,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#21
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.