↓ Skip to main content

The Human Toxome Collaboratorium: A Shared Environment for Multi-Omic Computational Collaboration within a Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Human Toxome Collaboratorium: A Shared Environment for Multi-Omic Computational Collaboration within a Consortium
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2015.00322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rick A. Fasani, Carolina B. Livi, Dipanwita R. Choudhury, Andre Kleensang, Mounir Bouhifd, Salil N. Pendse, Patrick D. McMullen, Melvin E. Andersen, Thomas Hartung, Michael Rosenberg

Abstract

The Human Toxome Project is part of a long-term vision to modernize toxicity testing for the 21st century. In the initial phase of the project, a consortium of six academic, commercial, and government organizations has partnered to map pathways of toxicity, using endocrine disruption as a model hazard. Experimental data is generated at multiple sites, and analyzed using a range of computational tools. While effectively gathering, managing, and analyzing the data for high-content experiments is a challenge in its own right, doing so for a growing number of -omics technologies, with larger data sets, across multiple institutions complicates the process. Interestingly, one of the most difficult, ongoing challenges has been the computational collaboration between the geographically separate institutions. Existing solutions cannot handle the growing heterogeneous data, provide a computational environment for consistent analysis, accommodate different workflows, and adapt to the constantly evolving methods and goals of a research project. To meet the needs of the project, we have created and managed The Human Toxome Collaboratorium, a shared computational environment hosted on third-party cloud services. The Collaboratorium provides a familiar virtual desktop, with a mix of commercial, open-source, and custom-built applications. It shares some of the challenges of traditional information technology, but with unique and unexpected constraints that emerge from the cloud. Here we describe the problems we faced, the current architecture of the solution, an example of its use, the major lessons we learned, and the future potential of the concept. In particular, the Collaboratorium represents a novel distribution method that could increase the reproducibility and reusability of results from similar large, multi-omic studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
Korea, Republic of 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 30%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,416,167
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,210
of 16,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,114
of 297,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#33
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.