↓ Skip to main content

Antioxidant Supplementation in the Treatment of Aging-Associated Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antioxidant Supplementation in the Treatment of Aging-Associated Diseases
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2016.00024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valeria Conti, Viviana Izzo, Graziamaria Corbi, Giusy Russomanno, Valentina Manzo, Federica De Lise, Alberto Di Donato, Amelia Filippelli

Abstract

Oxidative stress is generally considered as the consequence of an imbalance between pro- and antioxidants species, which often results into indiscriminate and global damage at the organismal level. Elderly people are more susceptible to oxidative stress and this depends, almost in part, from a decreased performance of their endogenous antioxidant system. As many studies reported an inverse correlation between systemic levels of antioxidants and several diseases, primarily cardiovascular diseases, but also diabetes and neurological disorders, antioxidant supplementation has been foreseen as an effective preventive and therapeutic intervention for aging-associated pathologies. However, the expectations of this therapeutic approach have often been partially disappointed by clinical trials. The interplay of both endogenous and exogenous antioxidants with the systemic redox system is very complex and represents an issue that is still under debate. In this review a selection of recent clinical studies concerning antioxidants supplementation and the evaluation of their influence in aging-related diseases is analyzed. The controversial outcomes of antioxidants supplementation therapies, which might partially depend from an underestimation of the patient specific metabolic demand and genetic background, are presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Lecturer 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 66 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 70 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,109,370
of 25,168,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,023
of 19,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,643
of 412,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#19
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,168,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.