↓ Skip to main content

Plant Alkaloids as an Emerging Therapeutic Alternative for the Treatment of Depression

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plant Alkaloids as an Emerging Therapeutic Alternative for the Treatment of Depression
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2016.00028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sadia Perviz, Haroon Khan, Aini Pervaiz

Abstract

Depression is a heterogeneous mood disorder that has been classified and treated in a variety of ways. Although, a number of synthetic drugs are being used as standard treatment for clinically depressed patients, but they have adverse effects that can compromise the therapeutic treatments and patient's compliance. Unlike, synthetic medications, herbal medicines are widely used across the globe due to their wide applicability and therapeutic efficacy associated with least side effects, which in turn has initiated the scientific research regarding the antidepressant activity. This review is mostly based on the literature of the last decade, aimed at exploring the preclinical profile of plant-based alkaloids (the abundant secondary metabolite) as an emerging therapy for depression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Master 13 9%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 55 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Chemistry 9 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 60 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14,184,606
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#4,488
of 17,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,218
of 409,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#41
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.