↓ Skip to main content

Splendor in the Grass? A Pilot Study Assessing the Impact of Medical Marijuana on Executive Function

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 20,014)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
335 X users
facebook
52 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
9 Google+ users
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Splendor in the Grass? A Pilot Study Assessing the Impact of Medical Marijuana on Executive Function
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2016
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2016.00355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Staci A. Gruber, Kelly A. Sagar, Mary K. Dahlgren, Megan T. Racine, Rosemary T. Smith, Scott E. Lukas

Abstract

Currently, 25 states and Washington DC have enacted full medical marijuana (MMJ) programs while 18 states allow limited access to MMJ products. Limited access states permit low (or zero) tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and high cannabidiol (CBD) products to treat specified conditions such as uncontrolled epilepsy. Although MMJ products are derived from the same plant species as recreational MJ, they are often selected for their unique cannabinoid constituents and ratios, not typically sought by recreational users, which may impact neurocognitive outcomes. To date, few studies have investigated the potential impact of MMJ use on cognitive performance, despite a well-documented association between recreational marijuana (MJ) use and executive dysfunction. The current study assessed the impact of 3 months of MMJ treatment on executive function, exploring whether MMJ patients would experience improvement in cognitive functioning, perhaps related to primary symptom alleviation. As part of a larger longitudinal study, 24 patients certified for MMJ use completed baseline executive function assessments and 11 of these so far have returned for their first follow-up visit 3 months after initiating treatment. Results suggest that in general, MMJ patients experienced some improvement on measures of executive functioning, including the Stroop Color Word Test and Trail Making Test, mostly reflected as increased speed in completing tasks without a loss of accuracy. On self-report questionnaires, patients also indicated moderate improvements in clinical state, including reduced sleep disturbance, decreased symptoms of depression, attenuated impulsivity, and positive changes in some aspects of quality of life. Additionally, patients reported a notable decrease in their use of conventional pharmaceutical agents from baseline, with opiate use declining more than 42%. While intriguing, these findings are preliminary and warrant further investigation at additional time points and in larger sample sizes. Given the likelihood of increased MMJ use across the country, it is imperative to determine the potential impact of short- and long-term treatment on cognitive performance as well as the efficacy of MMJ treatment itself.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 335 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 193 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Other 15 8%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 38 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 19%
Psychology 32 16%
Neuroscience 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 46 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 481. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#56,521
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#16
of 20,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,126
of 326,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.