↓ Skip to main content

Health Promotion Development in the Spa Treatment. Perspectives for the European Countries Learned from Poland's Experiences

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health Promotion Development in the Spa Treatment. Perspectives for the European Countries Learned from Poland's Experiences
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna Woźniak-Holecka, Piotr Romaniuk, Tomasz Holecki, Aldona Frączkiewicz-Wronka, Sylwia Jaruga

Abstract

The main aim of the paper is to outline the perspective for future developments of the spa treatment in light of demographic transitions characterized by the increasing number of seniors, as well as changing expectations and health needs of younger population. We made a systematic review of literature referring to the experience of Poland, and similar experiences of other countries in Central Europe. Based on the existing knowledge we conclude that spa treatment should become one of the preferred directions of development of health systems in European countries. Moreover, we state that a desirable direction to modify the therapeutic paradigm used in spa treatment is to put a far-reaching greater emphasis on the provision of innovative health promotion, which is justified by both its effectiveness, and strongly good foundation for its provision in spas. For this purpose it is necessary to extend the specialized health sector personnel with qualified health educators, which will enable an effective implementation of health promotion actions and their proper alignment to the specific target groups. Developing this category of specialists will also enable other professionals to concentrate on therapeutic activity fitting their competence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 41%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 10 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,400,885
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10,141
of 16,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,075
of 420,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#111
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,228 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.